Posted by on 19. Dezember 2020

… untested documents. With respect to the offending decision, it is clear that the correct answer was not presented and was not present. In case the petitioner could not show up on the day he… Petitioner`s office. The information was forwarded to respondent No. 2 in accordance with his request and the availability of the documents within the statute of limitations. Interviewees… Documents. The case was set for the hearing of 6.04.2015 and the petitioner was ordered to be present in person that day. It was also mentioned that in the event that he did not appear then ex parte decision would be… – SURINDER GUPTA, J. Complaint Opponent No.

2 Jasmer Singh filed an unconfirmed statement, and under oath to the police of Ghanaur police station, Patiala district on charges that Kansi that was… Level, Jasmer Singh brandished 4 of 10 CRR No. 3406-2016 -5- in action and filed the most graphic sworn insurance on which this FIR was recorded. 6. As per version in… against the petitioners to protect his country and not find any other way out, he gave an unconfirmed affidavit to the police, on the basis of which the instant FIR was recorded and Challan without… This paper argues that Spec Head`s „agreement, interpreted as a left-right merger agreement is not only a possible agreement configuration, but probably the unique configuration of the agreement, contra Agree (Chomsl-2001). The first part deals with the internal agreement of DP in Maasai and in English. The maasai DP certified contract models are extracted from the Spec Kopf agreement (Koopman 2003a, 2003b). The documented and unredealed correspondence patterns come out of the syntactic hierarchy and bypass.

The English distance sales contract in the DP does not support Agree, because an agreement can be triggered very early in the diversion. The second part of the paper examines the individual cases that were taken to help Agree. I will show how each case corresponds indeed to the head of Spec, where the following play an important role: the agreement can be triggered under Pied-Piping, balance sheet for the long-distance agreement in Tsez (Polinsky and Potsdam 2001) and the agreement can be triggered weak in the bypass, as in the English existential constructions. A case study of nominative objects in Icelandic implements a spec-head account and argues, on the basis of morphological evidence, that these constructions should be analyzed as double nominative constructions, the verb agrees with two nomines. The analysis refers to the nature of the inherent case (an argument is made that the original case must be broken down), the structural situation of the nominal case, the clausterial structure, the unspoken demands, the standard agreement, the double agreement and the intervention effects.