Posted by on 19. Dezember 2020

… Respondent/Plaintiff was not entitled to sell a specific benefit decree on the basis of the unregant agreement, Ex.P1?2) If the findings of the… was adopted in this case:“Heard.An action for certain benefits was ordered for sale on the basis of an unregord agreement. Qualified advice appears for the… The USSR Committee asked the Commission to provide information and information services on the services of the Office of Information and State Affairs. Qualified advice for … …. Bijender Mann aka Vijender Mann decided on 11.9.2013, stating: -“ a) a lawsuit for a given performance, on the basis of an unregant contract/contract at … The second appeal of the defendant, which challenges the judgments and judgments of the following courts, under which the appeal of the applicant and defendant No. 1 for concrete execution of the sale agreement in question…

a contract to the extent that, even if it is not registered, it forms the basis of legal action for a given benefit and as proof of the agreement or the participating benefit of a consideration… authorisation of the rule of law. [5]. As a result of the impugned order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the principle that the appeal was based on the… Property Act. Subject to Article 49 of the Registration Act, the non-registration of such a contract would not prohibit the introduction of legal action for a particular benefit on the basis of such an agreement…). The plaintiff/respondent filed an appeal for the specific execution of the agreement for sale of 20.10.2012 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff with respect to a semi house… …. 5. A simple examination of the contested decision makes it clear that the scholarly judge did not find that the sale agreement, since it is an unregant document, is not admissible in the evidence. Instead, the…

Mr. Richter simply indicated that an unregord purchase agreement entrusted the title to the petitioner. It is indeed banal to say that no title by a… Kota, owned by Late Shri Brij Mohan, who came in his part on the basis of a score. The house in question was sold by Shri Brij Mohan to petitioner Abdul Rasheed, by a sale agreement… There is no savings/deeming system under the law that takes into account the fate of unregistered ATS exported before May 1, 2017. In order to determine the fate of these ATs, the law could have been considered to have been registered under the Act before May 1, 2017 (subject to payment of a royalty to the relevant sub-registry), provided that even the ATS that were executed before May 1, 2017 are registered within a specified time frame, as required by the registration of current projects pursuant to Section 3 of the Act. In overturning the High Court`s decision, the bank found that the High Court had ignored the above points, while it felt that the unregulated document could not be considered for guarantees. It is concluded that, on the basis of the above Hon`ble Courts, the unregord sale agreement was legitimized, since it could be admissible in a lawsuit for a defined benefit and be admissible in the evidence relating to Section 49 of the Registration Act.