Posted by on 11. September 2021

Inappropriate influence: The teacher asked the students that anyone pay their rule 200, that the student get a full score in the viva. Now the teacher was in a fiduciary relationship with the students and was taking unfair advantage of such a position. Thus, such a contract, which the teacher diverts to the student, is questionable by the students. These agreements are not concluded and are based on one of the themes mentioned above. There is no liability for non-application of the contract and, therefore, the terms of the contract are not binding on either party. A Case LALMAN V/S GAURI DATT-1913: The nephew of the accused fled his native country. The plaintiff, who was a defendant servant, was sent to search for the missing boy. After the plaintiff went in search of a boy, the defendant issued a flyer announcing a reward of Rs.501.00 to anyone who could find his boy.